Statement of Accreditation Status
as of December 6, 2021
Please note: HLC is upgrading its database, and recent changes to the institution's schedule of upcoming reviews, history with HLC, or its general institutional information may not be reflected below. The institution's listed accreditation status is correct and up to date.
HLC is working to restore access to the most recent institutional information as soon as possible. It should be available by June 2022. HLC member institutions that need documentation of their accreditation records can download their Institutional Status and Requirements Report in Canopy or request an official letter from HLC.
Kansas Wesleyan University
100 E. Claflin Avenue
Salina, KS 67401-6196
(785) 827-5541
www.kwu.edu
The information on this page describes the accreditation relationship between this institution and the Higher Learning Commission. General information about the Commission and the accreditation process is provided at the end of this document. In addition, links to definitions are provided for many of the terms used.
Accreditation Information
Current status: Accredited
• Action Letter - Reaffirmation of Accreditation
| Accreditation date(s): | 01/01/1916 - 12/31/1918; 03/28/1958 |
Most recent reaffirmation of accreditation: 2016 - 2017
Next reaffirmation of accreditation: 2026 - 2027
Upcoming or In-Progress Reviews
| Date | Event | Description |
| 2026 - 2027: | Comprehensive Evaluation | |
Most Recent History With HLC
| Date | Event | Description |
| 09/01/2021: | Assurance Review | Review Accepted |
| 06/13/2017: | Comprehensive Evaluation | Continue Accreditation - Further, IAC voted to change the team's evaluation on Core Component 4C from "Met with Concerns" to "Met." The data included in the final report indicates that the institution demonstrates a commitment and attention to retention, persistence and completion rates in its offered programs. Furthermore, the institution's action of engaging an outside consultant demonstrates the institution's understanding of the data it needs to inform its decision and the intent to improve its internal processes. IAC determined that the team provided documentation that 4C was Met so that no interim reporting is required at this time. The rationale for this decision included: The visiting team report indicates that the institution demonstrates a commitment and attention to retention, persistence and completion rates in its offered programs. As stated by the team the college has "clearly defined goals" for student retention, persistence, and completion. The visiting team indicates the institution collects multiple sets of data and multiple examples are included in the final report that supports the primary requirements of Core Component 4.C. The visiting team's report indicates, the institution is in the process of compiling much of the supporting data that informs its decision making in this area, but the fact the data is being collected and analyzed demonstrates the institution efforts are mature and have evolved to the use of refined measurements systems including internal scorecards. The institution's action of engaging an outside consultant demonstrates the institution's understanding of the data it needs to inform its decisions and the intent to improve its internal processes. |
| 09/10/2007: | Comprehensive Evaluations - Continued Accreditation | |
General Institutional Information
This section provides brief, general information about the institution’s organization and scope as self-reported by the institution through its annual Institutional Update to HLC.
All institutions are required to represent themselves accurately and consistently to multiple agencies. However, some information about institutions may appear differently among agencies depending on the timing of the institution's updates to those agencies or those agencies' definitions or standards. Such agencies should be consulted directly for further information.
For example, an institution's "Control" (or "Type") may be categorized differently by the U.S. Department of Education for other purposes under its standards. Additional information can be found at nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/.
Control: Private NFP
Degree programs (number in each category): Bachelors (43), Masters (1)
Certificate programs (number offered): 0
Off-Campus Activities (This listing was last updated: ; the information may not be current.) The institution’s accreditation includes courses and programs at:
| In-State: | Campuses: | None.
|
||
| Additional Locations: | None. | |||
| Out-of-State: | Campuses: | None. | ||
| Additional Locations: | None. | |||
| Out-of-U.S.: | Campuses: | None. | ||
| Additional Locations: | None. | |||
| Location | Campuses | Additional Locations |
| In-State: | None. | None. |
| Out-of-State: | None. | None. |
| Out-of-U.S.: | None. | None. |
About HLC and Accreditation
The Higher Learning Commission (HLC) is an institutional accreditation agency that accredits degree-granting colleges and universities that are based in the United States.
Institutional accreditation validates the quality of an institution as a whole and evaluates multiple aspects of an institution, including its academic offerings, governance and administration, mission, finances, and resources. HLC’s accreditation includes all degree levels as well as onsite and online course delivery. Institutions of higher education in the United States may also seek accreditation through specialized or programmatic accreditation agencies, which accredit programs, departments or schools within a college or university.
Institutions that HLC accredits are evaluated against its Criteria for Accreditation, a set of standards that institutions must meet to receive and/or maintain accredited status. HLC’s Criteria for Accreditation reflect a set of Guiding Values.
The accreditation process is based on a system of peer review. Approximately 2,000 educators from institutions of higher education serve as HLC peer reviewers conducting accreditation evaluations for other institutions. They make recommendations to HLC’s decision-making bodies, which take final action on institutional evaluations and are made up of both peer reviewers and public members.
Evaluation Process
HLC accreditation assures quality by verifying that an institution (1) meets threshold requirements and (2) is engaged in continuous improvement. In addition, all institutions are required to data annually in the Institutional Update, undergo annual monitoring of financial and non-financial indicators, and adhere to HLC policies and practices, including Assumed Practices and Obligations of Membership.
Decision Making
HLC’s decision-making bodies evaluate and make decisions, called actions, on recommendations from peer review teams that review institutions for their compliance with HLC's Criteria for Accreditation and other requirements. The decision-making bodies are comprised of institutional representatives and public members. See Decision-Making Bodies and Processes for more information.
Public Information
HLC is committed to providing information to the public regarding accreditation decisions made regarding individual institutions.
Actions that are taken by HLC regarding an institution’s accreditation status are disclosed to the public. In cases of reaffirming continued accreditation, placing an institution on or reviewing a sanction, or withdrawing accreditation, the Action Letter issued to the institution is made available for viewing on the institution’s Statement of Accreditation Status, found by searching the institution’s name through HLC’s online directory. Public Disclosure Notices are also issued and posted in the directory in cases of sanction, assigning or removing an institutional designation, resignation of accreditation or candidacy, institutional closing or withdrawal of accreditation by HLC. The PDN provides the public with the most applicable information from the posted Action Letter. HLC decision-making outcomes also are summarized on the HLC Institutional Actions page.
Complaints Against Institutions
HLC has a formal complaint process, consisting of an online complaint form on the HLC website, for faculty, students and other parties to submit information regarding a member institution’s potential non-compliance with HLC requirements. HLC does not accept complaints through mail, email or over the phone. As stated in HLC policy, the complaints process is designed to enable HLC to review, in a timely and fair manner, information that suggests potential substantive non-compliance with an institution’s ability to meet HLC requirements.
The Higher Learning Commission word mark is a registered trademark owned by the Higher Learning Commission.