Statement of Accreditation Status
as of July 3, 2022
Central Baptist Theological Seminary
6601 Monticello Road
Shawnee, KS 66226-3513
(913) 667-5700
www.cbts.edu
The information on this page describes the accreditation relationship between this institution and the Higher Learning Commission. General information about the Commission and the accreditation process is provided at the end of this document. In addition, links to definitions are provided for many of the terms used.
Accreditation Information
Current status: Accredited
• Action Letter - Continued Accreditation
| Candidacy date(s): |
| |||||
| Accreditation granted: |
| |||||
Most recent reaffirmation of accreditation: 2018 - 2019
Next reaffirmation of accreditation: 2028 - 2029
Upcoming or In-Progress Reviews
| Date | Event | Description |
| 03/13/2023: | Comprehensive Evaluation | |
| 2028 - 2029: | Comprehensive Evaluation | |
Most Recent History With HLC
| Date | Event | Description |
| 01/02/2021: | Interim Report | Accepted |
| 07/23/2020: | Interim Report | Accepted |
| 01/28/2020: | Monitoring, Financial Indicator | Accepted with Monitoring |
| 12/03/2018: | Comprehensive Evaluation | Reaffirm Accreditation with Monitoring |
| 08/08/2018: | Monitoring, Financial Indicator | Waived - Since institution either recently submitted a report or hosted a visit related to finances, or will be submitting a report or hosting a visit related to finances, no further review is required at this time. |
| 12/20/2017: | Monitoring, Financial Indicator | |
| 09/14/2017: | Interim Report | Accepted with Continued Monitoring |
| 01/23/2017: | Interim Report | Accepted |
| 11/21/2016: | Interim Report | Accepted with Continued Monitoring |
| 05/16/2016: | Monitoring, Non-Financial Indicator | Accepted with Monitoring |
| 03/09/2015: | Comprehensive Evaluation | Continue Accreditation with Monitoring - The readers reviewed the teams work and evidence and did not concur that the individual items rose to the level of formal monitoring. The visiting team rendered excellent advice to the institution on a number of critical issues that need to be addressed. However, the overall evidence presented suggests that Central Baptist Theological Seminary possesses the mechanisms and the people to address most of these recommended improvements internally without a Commission mandate for multiple monitoring reports. Moreover, many of the needed improvements identified by the team revolve around or emanate from the institution's financial status and its consequent resource limitations that are well documented by the team in its review of Criterion Five. Monitoring is clearly required for core component Criterion Five-A concerns, as expressed under the recommended action above. |
| 01/27/2015: | Interim Report | |
| 12/19/2011: | Reaffirmation of Accreditation (PEAQ) | |
| 10/18/2010: | Financial Panel Recommendation | Added Monitoring report on finances |
| 08/28/2009: | Focused Evaluations - Commission Mandated | |
General Institutional Information
This section provides brief, general information about the institution’s organization and scope as self-reported by the institution through its annual Institutional Update to HLC.
All institutions are required to represent themselves accurately and consistently to multiple agencies. However, some information about institutions may appear differently among agencies depending on the timing of the institution's updates to those agencies or those agencies' definitions or standards. Such agencies should be consulted directly for further information.
For example, an institution's "Control" (or "Type") may be categorized differently by the U.S. Department of Education for other purposes under its standards. Additional information can be found at nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/.
Control: Private NFP
Degree programs (number in each category): Masters (5), Doctoral (1)
Certificate programs (number offered): 3
Off-Campus Activities (This listing was last updated: 05/05/2022; the information may not be current.) The institution’s accreditation includes courses and programs at:
| In-State: | Campuses: | None. |
||
| Additional Locations: | None. | |||
| Out-of-State: | Campuses: | None. | ||
| Additional Locations: | None. | |||
| Out-of-U.S.: | Campuses: | None. | ||
| Additional Locations: | Calvin University - Giheung, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi, KOREA, REPUBLIC OF |
|||
| Location | Campuses | Additional Locations |
| In-State: | None. | None. |
| Out-of-State: | None. | None. |
| Out-of-U.S.: | None. | Calvin University - Giheung, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi, KOREA, REPUBLIC OF |
About HLC and Accreditation
The Higher Learning Commission (HLC) is an institutional accreditation agency that accredits degree-granting colleges and universities that are based in the United States.
Institutional accreditation validates the quality of an institution as a whole and evaluates multiple aspects of an institution, including its academic offerings, governance and administration, mission, finances, and resources. HLC’s accreditation includes all degree levels as well as onsite and online course delivery. Institutions of higher education in the United States may also seek accreditation through specialized or programmatic accreditation agencies, which accredit programs, departments or schools within a college or university.
Institutions that HLC accredits are evaluated against its Criteria for Accreditation, a set of standards that institutions must meet to receive and/or maintain accredited status. HLC’s Criteria for Accreditation reflect a set of Guiding Values.
The accreditation process is based on a system of peer review. Approximately 2,000 educators from institutions of higher education serve as HLC peer reviewers conducting accreditation evaluations for other institutions. They make recommendations to HLC’s decision-making bodies, which take final action on institutional evaluations and are made up of both peer reviewers and public members.
Evaluation Process
HLC accreditation assures quality by verifying that an institution (1) meets threshold requirements and (2) is engaged in continuous improvement. In addition, all institutions are required to data annually in the Institutional Update, undergo annual monitoring of financial and non-financial indicators, and adhere to HLC policies and practices, including Assumed Practices and Obligations of Membership.
Decision Making
HLC’s decision-making bodies evaluate and make decisions, called actions, on recommendations from peer review teams that review institutions for their compliance with HLC's Criteria for Accreditation and other requirements. The decision-making bodies are comprised of institutional representatives and public members. See Decision-Making Bodies and Processes for more information.
Public Information
HLC is committed to providing information to the public regarding accreditation decisions made regarding individual institutions.
Actions that are taken by HLC regarding an institution’s accreditation status are disclosed to the public. In cases of reaffirming continued accreditation, placing an institution on or reviewing a sanction, or withdrawing accreditation, the Action Letter issued to the institution is made available for viewing on the institution’s Statement of Accreditation Status, found by searching the institution’s name through HLC’s online directory. Public Disclosure Notices are also issued and posted in the directory in cases of sanction, assigning or removing an institutional designation, resignation of accreditation or candidacy, institutional closing or withdrawal of accreditation by HLC. The PDN provides the public with the most applicable information from the posted Action Letter. HLC decision-making outcomes also are summarized on the HLC Institutional Actions page.
Complaints Against Institutions
HLC has a formal complaint process, consisting of an online complaint form on the HLC website, for faculty, students and other parties to submit information regarding a member institution’s potential non-compliance with HLC requirements. HLC does not accept complaints through mail, email or over the phone. As stated in HLC policy, the complaints process is designed to enable HLC to review, in a timely and fair manner, information that suggests potential substantive non-compliance with an institution’s ability to meet HLC requirements.
The Higher Learning Commission word mark is a registered trademark owned by the Higher Learning Commission.