Frequently Asked Questions

For Students

An institution’s accreditation will generally encompass all methods of delivery, though approval is sometimes needed before an institution can offer distance education.

Each institution determines its own policies and procedures for accepting transfer credits. The Commission expects our institutions to have clear policies on transfer of credit. Questions about the transferability of credits should be directed to the institution that the student is interested in attending.

The Higher Learning Commission does not rank or categorize schools. The Commission evaluates an entire educational institution in terms of its mission and our Criteria for Accreditation. Besides assessing formal educational activities, it evaluates such things as governance and administration, financial stability, admissions and student services, institutional resources, student learning, institutional effectiveness, and relationships with internal and external constituencies.

The Higher Learning Commission is an institutional level accreditation agency. Some programs or degrees at an institution (particularly in professional fields) may have accreditation from a specialized agency or association. Students preparing for careers that require licensure should inquire with their state or licensing agency to determine if specialized accreditation of their program or degree is required.

Questions regarding licensure should be directed to the agency or state that would be granting a professional license.

The Commission is not able to provide recommendations to students. A directory of the Commission's member institutions is available.


Visit the Contact Us page for information on submitting reports to the Commission.

Many states require an educational institution to be licensed to legally operate. This legal requirement is not accreditation, which determines the educational quality provided by the institution.

Through its Eligibility Process, the Commission determines whether an educational institution considering affiliation with The Higher Learning Commission is ready for a comprehensive visit by an evaluation team. The Commission works with the institution to determine the appropriate time for moving toward candidate or accredited status.

There are two types of educational accreditation: institutional and specialized. HLC provides institutional accreditation. Specialized accrediting bodies evaluate particular units, schools, or programs within an institution.

All accredited and candidate institutions are required to complete the Commission’s Institutional Update each year. This report, which is completed online, provides the Commission with up-to-date information on the scope of activities of each affiliated institution and sufficient information to understand and respond to significant shifts in an institution’s capacity and/or scope of educational activities. If you have questions, contact your staff liaison.

The Mark of Affiliation is used on member institutions' websites to indicate their affiliation status with the Commission. It is a key component of the Commission's program to provide information to the public about the accreditation relationship between the Commission and an institution.

Campus Visits

The Commission will send the institution an invoice for a scheduled peer review visit.

No. The team members are responsible for paying for their own expenses at the time of the visit. The Commission will bill the institution for all visit related expenses following the visit. Please see the Dues and Fees Schedule for more information.

The Commission begins setting teams for the next academic year in January. In some cases, you may not see information on a proposed team until late April. Please refrain from contacting your team until you receive the official "team set" letter from the Commission office.

By “team set” we mean that all members have been approved by the institution, have been invited, and have accepted the appointment to the team.

When setting teams, we consider a variety of things including your institution's desires for the team, the size of your institution, the high degree level, the carnegie classification, the mission/scope of your institution, and the institution's control.

For more information, visit Accreditation Processes.

Peer Review

Once you have completed the visit, send your reimbursement form and all necessary receipts to the Commission. The reimbursement form is available with the Resources for Peer Reviewers.

For more information, visit Resources for Peer Reviewers.


You can see your institution's most current Statement of Affiliation Status (SAS) in our Directory.

While the Commission cannot approve anything retroactively, it is still important that institutions submit an institutional change request as soon as possible. Depending on the type of change, the lack of approval may result in a delay in Title IV funds being released.

The Commission asks that change requests be submitted at least ninety days prior to the desired approval. Some changes may require a visit, a process that typically takes six months to complete. Institutions should contact their staff liaisons early in the planning process to determine when to submit a request.

Visit the Institutional Change page for an overview of the Commission's Substantive Change policies and the applications needed to gain approval for an institutional change.

Yes, but the institution's staff liaison should be notified beforehand.

For more information, visit Institutional Change.

Decision Making

The IAC meets 10 times a year. IAC Hearings are held three times a year. Institutions will be notified approximately two weeks after an IAC meeting or hearing as to whether a final action was taken or the matter is being forwarded to another decision-making body. For institutions considered for candidacy or initial accreditation and those receiving a recommendation to impose or remove a sanction or to withdraw status, the IAC Hearing Committee makes a recommendation to the Board of Trustees, which takes final action.

Institutions appearing before the IAC Hearing Committee should send no more than four representatives. It is in the institution’s best interest to review carefully the issues that led to the need for a hearing and make a determination about which individuals will best be able to respond to questions the Hearing Committee members are likely to ask. The institution is encouraged to contact the HLC staff liaison to discuss IAC Hearing participation if it is unclear who would best represent the likely topics to be covered.

For more information, visit HLC Decision-Making Bodies and Processes.