An institution begins the accelerated process for initial accreditation by submitting an application along with required Accelerated Process Application Evidence to demonstrate that it meets the qualifications for the process and that it meets other specific HLC requirements.

HLC staff assess the institution’s application to determine whether the institution meets the qualifications for the Accelerated Process for Initial Accreditation and whether it can demonstrate that it has certain essential characteristics that would make it eligible for HLC membership. This includes the opportunity for interaction with HLC staff through a combination of email, phone, or video-enabled conversations as needed.

This step culminates in a decision regarding whether the institution may proceed to the preliminary peer review.

Time Frame: HLC staff will typically respond to the institution within one month.

The preliminary peer review includes the following components:

• Abbreviated Assurance Filing demonstrating that the institution has provided sufficient narrative and evidence regarding each of HLC’s Criteria for Accreditation to proceed
• Institutional Data Form
• Compliance With Eligibility Requirements Form
• Compliance With Assumed Practices Form

Peer reviewers preliminarily evaluate the narrative and evidence provided by the institution. There is no in-person visit or other interaction between the institution and peer reviewers.

This step culminates in a decision regarding whether the institution may proceed to a comprehensive evaluation for initial accreditation. If the institution continues, it is assigned an HLC staff liaison at the conclusion of this step.

Time Frame: HLC anticipates that institutions will prepare and submit the required narrative and evidence within approximately three months following HLC’s response to the institution’s application (step 1). Institutions must submit these materials within no more than one year following HLC’s response to the institution’s application.

Upon submission of materials required for the preliminary peer review, the peer review panel takes approximately one month to evaluate the materials and determine the institution’s ability to continue with the process.

The institution submits its comprehensive evaluation materials and hosts an on-site visit by a peer review team.

The evaluation includes the following components:

• Full Assurance Filing demonstrating the institution’s compliance with the Criteria for Accreditation and all Core Components
• Institutional Data Form
• Compliance with Eligibility Requirements Form
• Compliance with Assumed Practices Form
• Federal Compliance Filing
• On-site visit, including if applicable, a Multi-Campus Visit
• Student Opinion Survey
• IAC Hearing
• HLC Board decision

Time Frame: Institutions should prepare for a comprehensive evaluation within approximately nine months after being informed by HLC that the institution may do so and must undergo the comprehensive evaluation within no more than one year from that time.

Visit timing will be coordinated with the institution to proceed on as accelerated a timeline as the institution desires, and as is practical, inclusive of the timing for the necessary IAC Hearing and Board meeting where the Board will consider the institution for initial accreditation.