Higher Learning Commission

Search

Find Accredited Institutions arrow

Master Chart of the Open Pathway Ten-Year Cycle

This chart outlines the cycle for the major components of the Open Pathway—Assurance and Improvement.1 The chart does not reflect any monitoring that may be required by some component of the Assurance Review, by Commission policy, or by institutional change requests. To create a personalized chart, enter the date of the institution's next reaffirmation of accreditation in the Year 10 column, then enter each preceding year in the previous columns. Use academic years.

 

 Year

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Enter Years

 

   

 

 

         

Assurance

Process




Institution may contribute documents to Evidence File


Assurance Filing (Assurance Argument and Evidence File)2  





Institution may contribute documents to Evidence File



Assurance Filing (Assurance Argument and Evidence File); Federal Compliance Requirements2

  Assurance Review (no visit3)

 

Assurance Review and Comprehensive Evaluation (with visit)

Improvement:

The Quality

Initiative







  


 Quality Initiative Proposal Filed (window of opportunity to submit)

        

Quality Initiative Proposal Reviewed

           

  Quality Initiative Report Filed

  

  Quality Initiative Report Reviewed

Commission

Decision-

Making




Action to Accept Assurance Review4






 

Action on Comprehensive Evaluation and Reaffirmation of Accreditation5

 

Other Monitoring

The Commission will continue to review data submitted by affiliated institutions through the Institutional Update, will apply change processes as appropriate to planned institutional developments, and will monitor institutions through reports, visits, and other means as it deems appropriate.

 

Key

Yellow:  Documents filed electronically by the institution

Green:  Review does not include a visit

Blue:  Review includes a visit

Pink:  Commission actions

 

Notes

1 the chart applies to institutions eligible for the Open Pathway

2 some institutions will also file materials for multi-campus review

3 team may require a visit to explore uncertainties in evidence that cannot be resolved at a distance

4 certain team recommendations may require IAC action

5 action on the Year 10 review will also determine the institution’s future Pathway eligibility